Thursday, February 23, 2017

IT’S OUR FATHER, NOT MY FATHER!




       It’s impossible to look at media – print, television news, Internet news or social media – without seeing alarming negative headlines about politics, elected officials and world affairs.  This may not be the first time in history that people were so polarized in their views on the various issues and people who should be elected to fix them, but because of the Internet everything is amplified.  Not to mention the ability everyone has to edit and photo shop information to suit their opinion – which leads us to a phrase that is currently the darling of all sides, fake news.  This is certainly not a new phenomenon just a resurrection and intensification of an old tactic.  Anyone who has read about the French Revolution knows that the road to the guillotine was paved with libel, gossip and denigration. The pornographic little libellés disseminated about Marie Antoinette were the era’s fake news.  They were based on court rumors, gossip and political vendettas so we will never really know the truth.  Sound familiar?  

                           
Marie Antoinette in court portrait

       To me there is only one real definition of fake news and it’s totally subjective.  It usually comes down to whether the source agrees with your narrative.  Yes you can try to research the original source, but so much of it is just repeated conjecture.  I am reminded of a quote from Nietzsche, “People don’t want to hear the truth because they don’t want their illusions destroyed.”

                              
Political cartoon of Marie Antoinette as harpy devouring hogs!


       The level of name-calling and vitriol surrounding all social/political issues has become overwhelming.  As a 73-year-old who has never been registered in a political party – I think my designation is listed as “decline to state” – my beliefs fall more in line with what is defined as libertarianTo quote Wikipedia, “libertarians seek to maximize political freedom and autonomy, emphasizing freedom of choice, voluntary association, and self-ownership.”  My idea of government’s role is far from the invasive bureaucracy that everyone sees as broken– they just see it as broken in totally different ways.

       The 2016 presidential election was a dog and pony show consisting of a large percentage of “gloss over the flaws of the candidate you found the least offensive, and beat up the other with any dirt reported.”  For my health and spirit I watch almost no news, read no newspapers, and try to skim past the material online.  (I actually think we should come up with a different term because “news” has become another word for opinion.) People sometimes question how I keep up with things, but trust me, just with the exposure to TV or radio in public places, checkout line headlines, Facebook and conversations between family and friends I get the gist without the endless speculation and repetition that passes for news.   I do read books, lots of non-fiction, and I tend to read several books in a row about a topic, country, etc.  One of my recent favorite topics is North Korea, which is a crime against humanity governed by one family that has enslaved a whole country for as long as I've been alive.   I also watch documentaries and often look for opposing points of view.  

       It has helped my serenity to avoid having exchanges with people on Facebook, but I have two examples of recent posts that were very heartening.  As someone who was a public school teacher, and has two daughters who've been public school teachers (one who is the long time director of a much loved public charter school where we were both involved from it’s inception) I’ve had the most curiosity about the nominee for Secretary of Education.  When a woman I know mostly from Facebook posted a negative article about the nominee, Betsy De Vos, ending with, “if you think that’s not the case please share you logic,” I broke my own rule and replied.  My point of view is based on my belief that this system has been broken for years, and President Carter’s formation of the Department of Education in 1979 has done nothing to improve it.  The Federal Department of Education operates a lot like skimming money in a Las Vegas casino, with the return being another set of rules where schools have to hire people to fill out more paper work, so I am one of those who think we could put a lot more money toward children by getting rid of it. From different sides of the fence we had a reasonable exchange, without agreement, but with respect and good will.

       Yesterday I read a post of a Facebook friend I have never met but who is a writer I admire.  She is a self-declared liberal, and following my desire to try to avoid political exchanges, I usually skip her political posts, but this one was titled “When We Hate” so I read it.  It was a well-written, openhearted piece about having compassion for someone you disagree with.  I pulled myself out of the comments section before I lost the real depth of what I had just read and got pulled back into the rancor, but not before reading her reply to someone, “we can be opposed to people and still say that person was kind and decent.”
                           
                               



       I am reminded of something my husband and I read recently in our morning prayers that include reading from Emmet Fox’s book of daily readings.  The section was on the Lord’s Prayer, which he takes apart starting with the distinction of “Our Father” not “My Father.”  “It forces upon our attention at the very beginning the fact that all men are the children of one Father…Here Jesus cuts away the illusion that the members of any nation, or race, or territory, or group, or class, or color, are, in the sight of God, superior to any other group.  The final point is the implied command that we are to pray not only for ourselves but for all mankind.”

      It seems that the world will continue to be embroiled in conflict of all kinds for the foreseeable future, and the only hope I can see for my personal serenity is to stay away from the chatter that dominates the public discourse.  I still read, think and try to speak sparingly about the events going on around me.  It’s not that I don’t care, I care as deeply as those passionate on either side of the spectrum. I think it is in agreeing on what action should be taken that things fall apart, but I don’t doubt the intentions of people of good will, and I pray for all of God’s creations.       

                 
Rufus - the Zen master!